Towards a New Architecture: Le Corbusier's Modernist Manifesto
Airfare Daily Deals eCigarettes Eyeglasses Hotels Jewelry Online Backup Online Dating Online Printing Online Tickets Skin Care Textbook Rentals Vitamins Web Hosting Weddings
Find thousands of shopping-related forums
SEARCH

Towards a New Architecture: Le Corbusier's Modernist Manifesto

Much of Le Corbusier’s manifesto Vers une architecture (1923) is dedicated to promoting the architectural virtues of the machine. His famous declaration, ‘The house is a machine for living in,’15 often misunderstood, meant that the guiding principle for architects should be to make the house as well suited to its purpose as was a machine.

Much of Le Corbusier’s manifesto Vers une architecture (1923) is dedicated to promoting the architectural virtues of the machine. Often misunderstood, his famous declaration, ‘The house is a machine for living in,’ meant that the guiding principle for architects should be to make the house as well suited to its purpose as was a machine. This reiterated the argument that functionalism was more important than appearance. In order to progress, he believed, it was necessary for architects to abandon the notion of traditional styles and decorative effects: ‘Architecture has nothing to do with the various ‘styles’…[they are] sometimes pretty, though not always; and never anything more.’ This implies that he saw the aesthetic, not as just another style, but as the very substance of architecture. Instead, he drew parallels between architecture and the ‘Engineer’s Aesthetic’, arguing that engineers were to be praised for their use of functionalism and mathematical order. As a consequence, architects were encouraged to emulate engineers and adopt these principles in order to attain harmony and logic in their designs. To reinforce this argument the illustrations of Vers une architecture celebrated the functional and architectural unity of Canadian grain stores, ships, aeroplanes and automobiles.From a present day perspective his principles are better illuminated by his architecture, since these illustrations (e.g. the Caproni Triple hydroplane) seem rather archaic.

The Maison Dom-Ino (1915) was an early example of his Engineer’s Aesthetic: three identical planes are suspended above each other by steel columns, a method of construction that frees the walls of their load-bearing purpose, and allows his concept of the ‘free façade’ to be introduced. An external staircase communicates between each level, and its location permits an unprecedented space and clarity in the plan. The components were all to be standardised and pre-fabricated, which would allow for rapid construction. This house was therefore a product of Le Corbusier’s intention to apply the principles of mechanical mass production to domestic architecture.

However, a substantial body of criticism (e.g. Greenhalgh, Sparke) has argued that this functionalism of Modernist theory was not based in reality. The machine aesthetic remained just that, as few of the designs were capable of being standardised. For example, the Grand Comfort chair by Le Corbusier and Charlotte Perriand was neither functional nor standardised. It required no less than eighteen welds and three materials, making it expensive and capable of production only by craftsmanship.

L’Esprit Nouveau, 1925

Le Corbusier’s pavilion L’Esprit Nouveau featured door handles supposedly derived from car or aeroplane handles. These were not standardised but had to be made individually. For this reason, virtually no products of Modernism were mass-produced, at least until the style was modified and practised on an international level in what became known as the International Style. For the pioneer phase, mass production remained a metaphor that, like the example of Henry Ford, could not yet be emulated. For this reason, virtually no products of Modernism were mass-produced, at least until the style was modified and practised on an international level in what became known as the International Style. For the pioneer phase, mass production remained a metaphor that, like the example of Henry Ford, could not yet be emulated.

Villa Savoye

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Le Corbusier Towards a New Architecture (2000, Architectural Press, Oxford. Translated by Frederick Etchells)

Crouch, Christopher Modernism in Art, Design and Architecture (1999, MacMillan Press Ltd. Hampshire)

Frampton, Kenneth Modern Architecture: A Critical History (1992, Thames and Hudson, Ltd. London)

Greenhalgh, Paul (ed.) Modernism in Design (1990, Reaktion Books Ltd. London)

Hitchcock, Henry-Russell and Johnson, Philip The International Style(1966, W.W. Norton and Company, New York)

Jencks, Charles Modern Movements in Architecture (1973, Ancor Books, New York)

Pevsner, Nikolaus Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius (1991, Penguin, London)

Sparke, Penny Design Source Book (First published in 1986 by Macdonald & Co Ltd, London)

Tisdall, Caroline and Bozzolla, Angelo Futurism (First published by Thames and Hudson Ltd, London, 1977)

Whitford, Frank Bauhaus ( 1994, Thames and Hudson, Ltd. London)

Woodham, Jonathan M. Twentieth-Century Design (First published by Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997)

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
experts
in Architecture on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Architecture?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (6)

great design

Beautiful!

Great work. Of course you know I wrote a lot on Le Corbusier and appreciate his works.

The Fibonacci Sequence prevails in everything he did. His message is important. Thanks Michael.

Very interesting and informative, I enjoyed reading it

Another masterpiece, Michael

ARTICLE DETAILS
RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE KEYWORDS